Talk:Traekoth, Jr

Is there a precedent for whether or not strategy sections are permitted on articles for high-stakes raid mobs? I would most definitely be in favor of restoring the strategy section provided by Anti if the only reason for its removal was to censor information from other players. If there's a legitimate rule against this sort of thing (something firmer than simply being "frowned upon"), then let's leave the strategy buried. Otherwise, it ought to be restored. Gnomish (talk) 23:14, 31 May 2015 (EDT)

Yeah, I saw the frowned upon and general hub-bub and felt that a reversion could help... I agree that a firmer stance would be nice. Marthog (talk) 00:45, 1 June 2015 (EDT)

Disregard my above comment, I suppose. The previous version featuring the strategy has been administratively hidden without dialog. Thanks anyway, Anti. Gnomish (talk) 00:46, 1 June 2015 (EDT)

Lots of adepts and mobs have Strategy sections. I copy and pasted the ==Strategy== tag from another mob also on the wiki that didnt get edited. This is a public wiki and there was no rules against adding personal experienced with the monsters that i could see.

User:Rari made a post on the forums describing a grace period for quest guides and mob strats, so older mobs should be alright Marthog (talk) 01:04, 1 June 2015 (EDT)