Talk:Evade

I [used the alternate] way so I am not constantly invisable to my group mates as I evade. (This does NOT trip the spam filter I have used the alternative way for years) Marthog (talk) From Druue.

STOP REMOVING MY PART OF THE PAGE Druue (talk) 10:44, 20 December 2016 (EST)

• It will remain removed because it does not follow the wiki's formatting policies (see http://wiki.shardsofdalaya.com/index.php/SoDWiki:Policy, under general formatting and talk pages headings), it's place is here on the talk page where I placed it. Please stop adding the transferred line back to the page. Thanks. Marthog (talk)
  • It is a part of the information and I will keep putting it back in!!! It is NOT a comment players need to know this information and it DOES NOT VIOLATE ANY POLICIES!!Druue
    • I disagree, we will keep it here.Marthog (talk) 20:16, 20 December 2016 (EST)
      • Fleshed out the article on evade and incorporated the information I think you were wanting on the page Druue in correct format. Hopefully everyone is happy now? Haenir (talk) 10:42, 21 December 2016 (EST)
        • The alternate version of the macro is missing. (update I see how you did the macro) and Marthog is still a jerk Druue (talk) 13:22, 21 December 2016 (EST)
          • Its also less relevant in 2.5 since I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) you can automatically see party members that are invis (still useful for raid situations). Haenir (talk) 14:49, 21 December 2016 (EST)

can we clear this page? (the evade page is a bit long and I like the bug thing at the bottom) Druue (talk) 18:42, 21 December 2016 (EST)

• Functionally yes, but talk pages are supposed to be open for conversation and opinions so we'll keep it for historical purposes like the other talk pages. It's useful to know why changes were made and what the arguemnts for and against were. So you calling me a jerk is an embarrassment you'll get to live with now.Marthog (talk)